Dear Jonathan Greenblatt CEO of Anti-Defamation League, Leo Frank (1884–1915) Atlanta B’nai B’rith President (1912–1914) was not convicted or lynched because of anti-Semitism, please stop, cease and desist in using the Leo Frank case to conflate it with every tragedy that occurs in modern days and then promote racist hate crime hoaxes to serve your covertly bigoted political agenda. #MeToo #Misogyny #Mysogenous #MaryPhagan #LeoFrank #StopRape #ChildrensRights #SexualAssault #BLM #BlackLivesMatter
I AM REQUESTING YOUR UNDIVIDED FOCUS: My personal request to you, dear reader, is that you PLEASE commit to completely and totally, reading every single bit of this open letter — which is addressed directly to and for the present leader of Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt, and all his ADL member staff. If you are a member or financial supporter of ADL, please read this letter from the first word to the very last with an open mind.
The reason you are being asked for this level of conscious effort is because a tremendous amount of time, thought, research, energy, and heart went into the creation of this appeal to reason, fair-mindedness, and common sense.
The research findings which are presented herewithin, or discussed throughout the main body of this long-winded labor of love, is not intended to be the final word on any subject or topic, but an inspiration for dialogue.
If any assertions made from top to bottom appears to be unfair, illogical, or unreasonable, please respond in the comments section below with any ideas or recommendations which come to mind, including relevant concerns, and related issues, so that we might begin a productive conversation and update this letter.
I will not ignore any productive comments, and with my commitment, now, encourage you further, without reservations, to fully, and totally, express yourself, about anything, contained within this asynchronous discourse.
I look forward to hearing from you, Moses Jacobs…
This letter is in direct response to CEO of the Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt’s articles ‘The Living Memory of a Lynching’ about the Leo Frank case posted on The Medium Corporation website www.Medium.com dated August 17th, 2016, and his August 17th, 2017 article, ‘What the Lynching of Leo Frank Shows Us About Hate’ published at www.Time.com in Time Magazine.
The said items are dated one year apart from each other, at separate anniversaries of Leo Frank’s lynching, which occurred long ago in the summer of 1915 at former Sheriff William Frey’s farming estate, near the perimeter of where Marietta and Atlanta border each other.
Furthermore, this detailed commentary will also address issues in ADL’s August 18, 2017, article ‘We must grapple with history to move forward’ by Lauren Jones, Civil Rights National Counsel at the Anti-Defamation League.
Lauren, we will explain in detail why your statements are false and then provide the evidence elucidating their erroneous nature.
FIRST SOME BACKGROUND READING
Link 1 August 17, 2016: https://medium.com/@J0NATHAN_G/the-living-memory-of-a-lynching-119cc584020 article by Jonathan Greenblatt
Link 2 August 17, 2017: http://time.com/4905006/adl-charlottesville-white-supremacy-nazis-leo-frank/ article by Jonathan Greenblatt
Link 3, August 17, 2017: https://www.adl.org/blog/we-must-grapple-with-history-to-move-forward by Lauren Jones
#hatespeech #misogyny #metoo #hatecrimehoax #pedophilia #leofrank #maryphagan #womensrights #feminism #jewishgentilerelations #childrensrights #crimesagainstchildren
Here we begin with a screen capture from Anti-Defamation League’s website www.adl.org clearly providing proof of a viciously anti-Gentile hate crime hoax, misogynist propaganda against the #METOO movement, and hate speech perpetrated by your organization. We are calling on you Jonathan Greenblatt as leader of Anti-Defamation League to address the blatant falsification of history published, not only, on your ADL organization’s website, but also being promoted elsewhere too. Let us begin.
Subversion of the Broad-Left by ADL?
Yes, indeed, Jonathan Greenblatt, Abraham Foxman, and Lauren Jones, by grappling with history, what you really have to do is stop using fake news and false history to advance the goals of your American pro-Israel-Apartheid group that pretends to be a civil rights organization. Don’t think that because you promote leftist intersectional programs in the United States, that this somehow excuses your hawkish, fascistic, ethnic supremacist and right-wing advocacy for Israel.
ADL the American PR Firm For Israel’s Crimes Against Humanity
Caught on film, published on mainstream news websites, and regularly condemned by the international community — including the U.N., each and every year, Israel murders more non-Jews in the middle east than White Supremacist domestic extremists have reportedly killed in the United States over the last 50 years! Do the Math! Everyone gets it now, when you bring up domestic extremism in the United States, it’s to deflect attention from the more than one million non-Jewish people ethnically cleansed in the Israel-Palestine conflict taking place since 1948. The abuse hasn’t stopped since.
ADL’s Two Faces, Progressivism for America and Ethno-Fascism for Israel
Nobody is fooled, especially on the left by the ADL’s public relations whitewashing for Israel’s 70-year-long campaign of war crimes using American military equipment and redirecting blame on the non-Jewish indigenous people of Palestine who resist their genocidal occupation. We have signed up for all your email newsletters, been reading them on a regular basis when you send them out, and following the development of your website since it first went live on the Internet. This two-faced game of yours is up. Social Democrats and the left at large, have not been tricked by your ethno-extremism, right-wing militancy, anti-Arab, and pro-racist behavior with regard to your support of Israel’s crimes against humanity, which you hide behind the facade of Western progressivism in the United States. You are not an ally of the left but a trojan horse.
ADL’s Misogynist Disinformation War Against American History
Moreover, The false history you promote on the Leo Frank case is misogynistic to the very core and homicidal pedophile-denialist revisionism in the extreme. By using undeniable trickery to convince people Leo Frank is innocent, you are committing a grave injustice against women and children of this nation who were subjects of sexual assault and murder. Your bonafide falsification of history in favor of the womanizer, serial sexual harasser, and strangler-pedophile Leo Frank is the brutish male chauvinist bigotry every feminist on the planet earth should fight against #MeToo. And we hope to appeal to their feminine sense of justice, in an effort to inspire all feminists, whether they be male or female, to confront your racist organization for its extreme misogyny and misandry in the case of Leo Frank.
August 17th, 2017
Dear Anti-Defamation League CEO Jonathan Greenblatt, National Director Emeritus Abraham Foxman, ADL Staff, Jewish activist groups of the alphabet soup garden variety and Jewish Community at Large,
The sex murder of Mary Phagan on April 26, 1913, at noontime, followed by the ensuing trial of Leo Frank during the summer of 1913, which later culminated in his 1915 lynching, has seen peaks and valleys of interest in the last 100-odd years, but most of the information presented about the case in the academy and press has been a web of partisan misrepresentations, resulting in more than a century of disingenuous historiography.
The people who have written about the Phagan sex murder case have been overwhelmingly Leo Frank partisans, which is why most of what has been written about this affair since its inception has been grossly biased and one-sided in his favor. The modern version of the Frank-Phagan affair has been turned into pseudo-religious dogma, historical fiction, and fake news mythology, something no longer resembling the primary legal records documenting the immense inquiry into this true crime.
The Mary Phagan Murder Trial and Leo Frank’s Appeals
The GSC (Georgia Supreme Court) legal records in the case of Leo Frank, concatenate his trial brief and petitions for appeal. Published in two forms, unabridged and in digest format, they are no longer buried away in dusty government archive vaults. They contain valuable information never seen before and were published on the Internet several years ago by Atlanta librarian curators for full public viewing. These docs open the pandora's box of White supremacist horrors Leo Frank’s team use to subvert justice. That subversion of justice continues today.
ADL Blood Libel Defamation
Now, ADL, your slanders, defamation against the dead, and blood libel accusations of anti-Semitism against Southerners can no longer be substantiated, as the Leo Frank courtroom proceedings and appeals records tell the true story of what your nefarious group has been suppressing for 100-odd years. Moreover, the Ga Supreme Court appeals paperwork gives even more details about the criminal affair coverup than the trial transcript digest (brief of evidence) and we hope more people will read them.
Fulton County Library Microfilm of 1913 Atlanta Daily Newspaper Reports: Atlanta Constitution, Atlanta Journal and Atlanta Georgian
All of the Atlanta daily newspaper reports, bookended between the murder of Mary Phagan (an EXTRA published on Sunday, April 27th mentions it), all through until the eventual conviction of Leo Frank (August 25–26, 1913), had been acquired from the Fulton County Library and other archival resource locations in Georgia. What followed next was their process of being scanned/digitized and transcribed. The trial transcript was recently stenographed in 2019 from the reports put out by these press organs in August 1913.
These reports provide evidence against your ADL organization’s cherry-picked version of events, and debunk many of your racist hate crime tropes. These modern transcriptions of century old newspaper articles, also reveal many of the racist anti-Black statements Leo Frank and his defense counselors made to the press. These almost lost to history newspaper articles were unavailable to most people outside of Georgia until the Internet age gave them availability to the whole world. Other than us students of the Leo Frank case, who is going to press their faces against a microfilm machine for two years? People want convenience, so luckily the text versions are published online for easy reading.
ADL Please Stop the Your Antigentile Defamation of African-Americans and European-Americans. Neither We Today or Our Ancestors Framed Leo Frank. The #MeToo Movement Applies To All of History, Not Just Today!
We ask, what’s it going to take to stop ADL’s misogynist and anti-Gentile defamation of non-Jewish Americans? What’s it going to take to stop your organization from regurgitating its murder-denialist, misogynist, and Antigentilic ethnocentric extremist canards in the media against women and Gentiles of all races, concerning the pedophile sex killer Leo Frank?
We have lots of screen captures.
A National Inquiry is Requested by Students of the Frank-Phagan Case
The dry leaves of the trial and appeals (1913–1915) are available to every mature adult of above-average intelligence in the world who can comprehend the English language and utilize the Internet effectively. Thus, we no longer live in a world where political partisans can monopolize the narrative of history by fiat of manufactured consensus in academia or media. Moreover, the Internet has become a world culture where most people have little tolerance for groups like ADL or SPLC (similar groups too) which egregiously falsify history for fundraising (something which is quite illegal).
ADL you have been caught redhanded and you especially owe women an apology for being enablers of sexual abuse, sexual harassment, and violence by males against the female gender, and you do this by covering up for Leo Frank. When you falsify history to make people believe he was innocent, you are committing an attack against all females who have been victims of violence by men. And history is rife with such actions. ADL has basically become a PR firm and apologists for the homicidal-pedophile Leo Frank the strangler-rapist.
ADL Engages in Gross Misogyny and Suppresses Leo Frank’s Startling Admission
Your so-called “civil rights” group is engaging in mendacious revisionism and gutter misogyny by defending the indefensible position that a habitual child molester of his sweatshop child laborers, who became a convicted sex-killer of an innocent 13-year-old girl, was “wrongfully convicted” after he fundamentally admitted on the witness stand to the jury that he was “unconsciously” at the scene of the crime when the murder occurred and that he went there to use the toilet. When the police found Mary Phagan, her clothes were soaked from head to toe in urine. Coincidence?
This fact about “unconsciously going to the metal room for a call of nature” is now the open secret of this new millennium, about this trial of the century. Those legal records which were locked away for 100 years are now in the public domain and published online for globewide examination. They reveal habitual sexual harassment by Leo Frank against the young girls working in his industrial sweatshop and they reveal he tried to frame two innocent black men of the Phagan slaying. The appeals records reveal the extent Leo Frank’s defense team went to bribe and suborn perjury from witnesses at the trial. Governor John Slaton’s law firm was the epicenter of behind the scenes criminal effort to maliciously vindicate Leo Frank. It was well documented in 1914 and we have those documents now.
Serious Questions
Why would ADL continue falsifying the legal documents of a well-documented trial, when students of jurisprudence can so effortlessly prove your “civil rights organization” is making claims which amount to anti-Gentile blood libel? Why would you put your religion and ethnicity, above justice for women by throwing the whole female gender under the bus with your whole misogynist bamboozle regarding Leo Frank?
What purpose does it serve in ADL’s mission of fighting to achieve fair treatment for all, when you continue to misrepresent the Frank-Phagan affair as a kind of Gentile-Jewish persecution mythos? We get it, you do it for fundraising, but when you use anti-Gentile tropes and canards to raise money, it gives a lot of people the impression you are using fearmongering as a criminal racketeering enterprise.
It seems to have mystified your organization that Leo Frank being lynched does not mean he is automatically exonerated for raping and strangling to death a teenage girl. Convicted homicidal Pedophiles are killed all the time in prison, though this is obviously extrajudicial (immoral) and therefore technically illegal, it does not overturn their crimes and jury verdicts.
Silence About Leo Frank Team’s Racial Prejudice Against African-Americans
Why does ADL refuse to address the racist anti-Black statements Leo Frank and his defenders were quoted, time and time again, in the Atlanta newspapers at the time? Shall we do an audit and post them here?
Leo Frank is quoted in the Atlanta press as saying the murder of Mary Phagan was a “Negro crime”. His attorney’s, Rosser and Arnold, in their August 21, 1913, closing arguments used racist gutter invective equating Black people with savage subhuman animals. Why does your organization which claims to fight for the fair treatment of all censor these statements?
The NOI’s book, ‘Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume III’ does a great job quoting the newspapers of the time and the perorations of Reuben Arnold and Luther Rosser, revealing some hideously racist anti-Black statements by Leo Frank and his defense counsel. Since your organization has been silent about that anti-Black racism for 100 years, we should definitely talk about it more for the next 100 years, until ADL stops ignoring it.
Ethnicity and Religion Above Truth and Justice?!
There is no excuse for putting your own race, ethnicity, religion or ethnoreligion above others in matters of a child or children being touched inappropriately, abused, brutalized, snuffed out and mutilated — no matter what her race or religion, and the fact that she is not Jewish — justice and truth should be blind to one's immutable characteristics. Phagan had no control of what race or religion she was born into, and her religion was largely a reflection of her parents, culture, and region. Phagan was not less of a human being because she was born a female and raised in one of the Christian denominations, in her instance as a Baptist. She is not less of a human being because she was born a Gentile and not a Jew. It’s unconscionable you would hold these immutable characteristics against her and treat this young child as nothing more than a plot device.
Double-Down Every year?
Is this going to be a yearly event, where around August 17th you remind the whole world that your organization is just a racist front for the Apartheid state of Israel, not one seeking justice and fair treatment for all people? This is the impression we get every time you promulgate the “Leo Frank wasn’t a deadly pedophile” hoax and try to conflate it with the fight against anti-Semitism, while invoking a one-sided narrative about Israel throughout your website.
In case you haven’t noticed, we on the political left can see right through the purpose of your organization, which is to engage in seemingly pedophile-denialism and the crudest of misogyny regarding the Leo Frank case, and simultaneously be a public relations apologist firm for Israel’s crimes against humanity in occupied Palestine.
No amount of censorship promoted by your organization will change the fact that everyone politically on the left is fully aware of your nefarious illiberal advocacy for Israel’s illegal occupation and its relentless war crimes against the State of Palestine. We on the left see right through your geopolitical aims domestically and internationally. As a Jew, I am appalled by your claim to uphold justice for all, but not see your own irony.
With respect to your domestical social-political aims, we on the left are calling you out for your blatant misogyny, and homicidal child molester denialism with regards to the Leo Frank case. We are calling on you to do the right thing in the name of social justice for Mary Phagan. #stopchildabuse
Anti-Black Framing
Why do members of ADL continue to make racist anti-Black statements by falsely accusing a Black man of murdering Mary Phagan? Why do ADL members continue to try and frame an innocent man of colour, who has long passed away and can not defend himself? A man who in part helped Atlanta police detectives solve the sex-crime that had shrouded Mary Phagan in mystery.
Anti-White and Anti-Christian Accusations of Wrongful Conviction and Mistrial: “Hang the Jew or We’ll Hang You!”
Why are credentialed members of the Jewish community with advanced degrees from the academy, so brazenly willing to lie about so-called mobs of hostile crowds shouting anti-Semitic threats of mayhem through the open windows of the Leo Frank trial at the judge, witness, armed guards, family members, and jurymen, when no evidence of it exists in the Frank appeals records or Atlanta newspaper accounts?
We have access to those original records and you do too. What purpose does it serve for you to misrepresent those legal documents?
Examples of people who propound this Antigentile hate crime trope: Abraham Foxman, ADL National Director Emeritus, Op-Ed August 18, 2005; Leonard Dinnerstein (Leo M. Frank and the American Jewish Community, November, 1968); ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt (screen captures), ADL’s Lauren Jones (screen captures), Rabbi Steven Lebow of Marietta Ga, Atlanta Constitution 2000; former Governor of Georgia, Roy Barnes 11 Alive TV, March 2019; Dale Schwartz *ADL attorney Leo Frank Posthumous Pardon*; Alan Dershowitz, Law Professor Donald Wilkes, and many others (Numerous examples from Audiobook segment 9 and 10 of Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume thrice at The American Mercury, bibliography section of this article.)
Jews Versus Gentile Tribal War Narrative
Why does your organization intentionally create artificial narratives about Jewish-Gentile relations which amount to “othering” and thus “us versus them” politics? Why does ADL lie about Jewish-Gentile relations a century ago, claiming anti-Semitism was rampant in the South when the opposite is true? We have the census data. Many Jews and Gentiles were fully engaging in interfaith marriages. Rabbi Lebow of Marrieta Ga., continues in the long Southern tradition of uniting Christians and Jews in matrimony.
The Troubling 1980s
Since the illegal half-pardon of Leo Frank was issued in Atlanta on March 11, 1986, a response was made shortly thereafter by the Phagan Family in the publishing of ‘The Murder of Little Mary Phagan” by the victim’s namesake Mary P. Kean (first printing, 1987). One year hence, Hollywood launched its atrocious 2-part made-for-TV miniseries, “The Murder of Little Mary Phagan”, which was aired in January of 1988. That same year, activist Robert Seitz Frey, put out a mean spirited and academically unsound, book in 1988 called, “The Silent and the Damned”, which your former organizational leader, Abraham Foxman, gave rave reviews for, even though the propaganda book was based on academic dishonesty. If you would like examples of how this book engaged in academic fraud we can provide a detailed list.
The Frank-Phagan Affair Goes Mostly Quiet During the 1990s
In American Heritage Magazine, October 1996, two ethnoreligious activists: Leonard Dinnerstein (deceased), Emeritus Professor of Judaic Studies at University of Arizona; and Jewish-American Fulton County Librarian, Stephan Jacob Goldfarb — published together, dizygotic articles, one of which was about supposed new insights into Leo Frank’s legal travails, proving definitively he was “framed”. Although similar in scope, these articles were separately written and placed adjacent to each other within the pages of said, Autumn issue.
Ethnic Warfare Over Many Lifetimes: The Long Game
Summarily, Dinnerstein and Goldfarb predictably promulgated their very own uniquely rehashed, but tired old conspiratorial theories, tending to complement each other’s biased works by design. The goal is clear, serving the historically contrived cause of intentionally creating a heavyweight chain of multi-decade, multi-generational, and multi-lifetime consensus that Leo Frank was “innocent”. There is now available online more than 100 years worth of post-1915 evidence that this conspiratorial tendency is absolutely no accident, nor coincidental, but a well orchestrated long-game by necessity, one of careful design. We know this contrived effort to be a pattern by using computers to scan, digitize and compare what has been written about Leo Frank in the popular culture by his enthusiasts between 1915 and 2015, and we used data mining tools to examine the differences with what is contained throughout the 2,500 pages in Georgia’s judiciary records office about Leo Frank from 1913–1915.
NYC 1964, Leonard Dinnerstein’s Future Career in Academia Was Monumentally Shaped By His Leo Frank Case Research Decision
In 1964, Leonard Dinnerstein, a 30-year-old, Political Science graduate student at Columbia University in North Manhattan, began his conspicuous ethnoreligious activism on the early 20th-century true crime drama which began on April 26, 1913, and concluded on August 17, 1915.
In 1966, Dinnerstein’s politically biased Ph.D. dissertation on the Leo Frank case was published, thereafter his career began, and he dedicated half a lifetime to academia as a full-fledged member of the intelligentsia. He utilized the entire span of his career in the ivory tower, as a purveyor of disinformation on the Leo Frank case. His bogus-academic rehabilitation efforts for the 1915 lynching victim, finally ended in January of 2019, when he passed away in Arizona of kidney failure. Combining all the years of his adult life as a pseudo-scholarly quack, his activism on behalf of the Jewish community spanned almost half a century. He has done irreparable harm to those who were fooled by his malfeasance.
Leonard Dinnerstein in his pseudo-intellectual writings about Atlanta’s Mary Phagan murder trial, where Leo Frank was the defendant fighting for his life — propounds the anti-Gentile canard that Atlanta District Attorney (DA), Hugh Dorsey was a rogue prosecutor, unscrupulously ambitious, who had designs on becoming governor of Georgia, so to achieve these ends, he intentionally framed and prosecuted Leo Frank, who was sentenced to death by hanging at the conclusion of the trial. And get this, we’re supposed to be made to believe, Dorsey knowingly let a “guilty” black man go free.
Goldfarb lays out a new parallel conspiracy theory, Leo Frank he asserts, was actually framed by Pinkerton Detective Harry Scott and this librarian presented shoddy evidence to this effect in 1996, which was wholly unconvincing even for Leo Frank enthusiasts. Goldfarb in his attempt to convince us that the sleuth Harry Scott — hired by stationary magnate, Sigmond Montag — actually framed Leo Frank, ended up causing the opposite effect (American Heritage Magazine, 10/96) — many people after reading Goldfarb’s 1996 article looked up the 1917 legal records of the Pinkerton Detective Agency versus National Pencil Company. After reading these rarely discussed court documents, which number more than 200 pages, most people conclude with even greater certainty their belief in Leo Frank’s guilt.
PARADE: “A TRUE STORY”. A LOVE STORY. A MUSICAL.
REBIRTH OF THE LEO FRANK CASE ON STAGE
Launched in Decemberish 1998, the Leo Frank Broadway musical called “Parade” had a very rocky start with mixed reviews and seemed to have mojo’d out after only 80-odd showings. In Broadway statistical terms, 83 showings, and a final-closing production in such a short run, is considered to be unsatisfactory — a financial failure. Broadway is always looking for new hits with decades-long staying power, ones garnering a flood of hot reviews, and packing its stadium theatre seats for high earnings, thus tapping into NYC’s billion-dollar tourism industry, year after year. In the first iteration of Parade, it was by Broadway’s hopeful standards a tepid and exceedingly insufficient, but that would not be the last word on the matter.
The musical ‘Parade’ was almost forgotten and left behind in the 20th century.
What quickly became at the pre-millennium Y2K time frame, a drama-artifact, almost lost to thespian cultural history, was several years thereafter, massaged, trimmed-down and reworked into a sensational, post-millennium success in the early years of the 21st century. The phoenix had risen from the ashes, and this time the play was set to go international, touring the world in many tongues.
New Millennia, January 1st, 2000: A Fresh New Start
Parade round two, the leaner and modified version(s) of the bloated original emerged afresh — after a much needed healthy sabbatical. That’s when the drama went viral henceforth, having immediately taken the international thespian community by a wild storm. This re-engineered play soon developed into a cult classic among theater enthusiasts around the world. Twenty years later after the musical first flopped, the second iteration is still being performed in tertiary theaters around the globe and in many different European languages. Even Down-Under in the land of OZ, on the literal opposite side of the world, people got a glimpse of Leo M. Frank.
Parade Second Edition 2005 Onward
Timing is everything. The byproduct of this curious rise from the dead of ‘Parade the Leo Frank Broadway Musical’, which was not historically accurate and took great historical liberties in creative license — coupled along with the then coming double centennials (2013, 2015) of the 1913 sex-strangulation and the 1915 vigilante revenge-lynching — is that it had undoubtedly increased emotionally-charged tensions about revisiting Southern history’s dark past and the tendency to alter the facts of the case for a twisted kind of social justice, where Mary Phagan was no longer the victim, and the sadistic child molester Leo Frank became a civil rights icon.
Many assimilationist Jews who were part of interfaith marriages, were concerned by the revitalization of the divisive social-politics encompassing this Jewish cause-celebre formed around efforts to get Leo Frank exonerated. Many old-timers in the Jewish community of Georgia wanted the story buried by history and never brought up again. Moreover, if you asked 100 people in Georgia during the year 1999 if they had heard of Mary Phagan or Leo Frank, you might find half a dozen people who knew about the incident. Few people had heard of Leo Frank and his “Southern trial of the Century”, until ‘Parade’ brought the affair again into the spotlight.
The 21st-Century Leo Frank Information War: History Meets Propaganda
The 21st Century would reignite the affair, and the propagandists came forward to stake their claims. To name some of the more prominent among them, Elaine Marie Alphin, “An Unspeakable Crime: The Prosecution and Persecution of Leo Frank” (2010); Matthew Bernstein, Screening a Lynching, 2009; Steve Oney, “And the Dead Shall Rise: The Murder of Mary Phagan and Lynching of Leo Frank” (2003); Ben Loeterman, Shockumentary, People v. Leo Frank (2009); Leonard Dinnerstein, “The Leo Frank Case” (2008/2012 reprint edition), Robert Seitz Frey, “The Silent and the Damned” (Paperback edition, 1988, 2002), and others pro-Frank activists, collectively released many new treatments of the Frank-Phagan affair and other lesser-known pro-Leo-Frank authors and journalists have emerged since the turn of the millennia. The majority of the Leo Frank aficionados all seem to have one thing in common, they befog the case’s official courthouse records, perpetuate the myth Leo Frank was not fairly convicted, and that he was 2-years hence, assassinated solely because of anti-Semitism.
Yet, the three of these artificial narratives are false as hundreds of modern students explore the case with modern analysis continue to shed new light on what likely happened and what was less likely.
Coming Around Full-Circle the Questions that Keep Arising is Why?
Why are so many Jewish journalists and high-brow intellectuals engaging in such blatant acts of academic dishonesty over this long-dead womanizer and sexual predator who went over the edge and committed a hideous rape-slaying? Objectively, it doesn’t take long to figure out the people developing an orthodox web of lies about the case of Leo Frank, are of Jewish descent. As a Jew, it hurts me to admit this fact. But the salient question is why? Why do so many of my coreligionists feel that Leo Frank’s lynching retroactively exculpates him of the crime which he admitted in private to doing?
This is not meant to be an attack against Jewish people at large, but why are so many easily disprovable and malicious claims about this true crime coming from Jews? Why are my people doing this execrable work which is so painfully apparent?
We will publish the list and examples if needed, with bibliographical sources to the direct pages and paragraphs.
Big Picture Question: What is the psychology behind so many prominent people working together to make fallacious statements about the murder of Mary Phagan which cannot be substantiated and are easily disproved?
Academic: What would cause people with advanced collegiate degrees to commit academic fraud with regard to Leo Frank’s supposed innocence?
Blood Libel Goes Both Ways: Why do so many Jews use the Frank case to make false accusations of anti-Semitism against Southerners with respect to the trial, when there is no real substantiative evidence of anti-Jewish behavior at the trial?
Why do Jews feel so passionate about defending a convicted homicidal pedophile who had a fair trial with no technical errors, according to the Georgia and United States Supreme Court?
Is it all about the Lynching?
Does the fact that Leo Frank was illegally hanged, somehow invalidate the claims of his sweatshop child laborers that he was offering these children money for sex on payday (Coroner’s Inquest), that he touched a girl’s breast (Coroner’s Inquest), was entertaining prostitutes, and sexually harassing teenage and pre-teen girls working in his sweatshop (trial)?
Does the fact Leo Frank beat Mary Phagan’s face into a purple pulp with his fists, and slammed her head against a metal pipe handle on a lathe, before he ripped open her undergarments, and then sadistically raped her, somehow, get invalidated because he was hanged outside the jurisdiction of the law two years later?
We might ask tangentially, is Jeffrey Dalmer innocent of his sex murder crimes because he was killed in prison? Do convicted sex killers become ‘not guilty’ when they are extrajudicially assassinated during their serving time at incarceration facilities?
DOES THE TRUTH WIN IN THE END?
Now that the 2,500-page official documents of Frank’s great legal effort are in the public domain and published online at numerous websites, every new credentialed activist or member of a so-called civil rights group who steps forward to perpetuate the century-old web-of-lies gets immediately embarrassed and humiliated with the real facts presented by students of this true crime affair. Students of the Phagan-Frank case will go to every online bookstore, and discussion forum to let everyone know, we have another activist busted and we will post the segments of the trial testimony proving it.
His lynching was technically unjust, but it does not undo his sadistic crimes, which included mutilating her corpse.
We’re NOT going to take it, anymore -Twisted Sister.
It can’t be stated enough, people have little patience these days for pseudo-scholar academic types and fake news journalists. Any news article, scholarly paper or book written about the Frank-Phagan saga, now has an army of citizen researchers in tow, debunking every specious assertion being propounded in them. When a journalist or wannabe intellectual makes false statements, the whole world is informed, articles to this effect are published everywhere possible on the world wide web to warn other people. Thus any internet search of the charlatan's names in question will bring up those exposé results and it will let the whole world know we have caught another con-artist building on the cobwebs of academic legacy fraud. We will even go so far as to lobby politicians to create new laws prosecuting people who promote hate crime hoaxes, like the ones about claiming the jury was terrorized with hate speech into killing an innocent Jew. And moreover, the pardon of Leo Frank is also going to have to be overturned. The people of Georgia must be called upon to elect politicians who will have Leo Frank’s pardon invalidated.
The question we might ask: Is this a criminal act, using a hate crime hoax to fearmonger or terrorize people with false history and raise money with it?
The women’s rights movement demands an apology from ADL for promoting this misogynist hate crime hoax.
ACADEMIA ROTTEN FROM WITHIN AND SUBVERSION OF HISTORY
It is deeply fascinating when it comes to Jewish-Gentile issues, many credentialed academics are willing to disgrace themselves by promulgating hate crime hoaxes that are easily disproved, like Leonard Dinnerstein who promulgates the anti-Gentile “Hang the Jew” hoax in the 1968 November issue of the American Jewish Archive Journal.
Leonard Dinnerstein’s Most Famous Example of Academic Fraud
Starting on page 110 of this item is the example of Leonard Dinnerstein creating an unsourced fabrication based on academic dishonesty:
“Beyond the main testimony, the jurors had little more on which to base their decision than hearsay, rumors, and unsubstantiated accusations. Yet most members of the public were thoroughly convinced of the defendant’s guilt and made their voices heard, The intense summer heat necessitated that the courtroom windows be left open, and remarks from the crowds could be heard easily by those inside. “Crack the Jew’s neck!” — “Lynch him!” — were some of the epithets emerging from the more boisterous. Threats were also made “against the jury that they would be lynched if they did not hang that ‘damned sheeny.’ “
This anti-Gentile and obviously racist hate crime hoax directed at White Gentile Southerners is also repeated by more than just Leonard Dinnerstein, Abraham Foxman, and Rabbi Steven Lebow, but numberous other prominent members of the Jewish community, which will be presented in this aggregate of the anti-White, anti-Christian and anti-Southern blood-libel: The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews Volume 3: Leo Frank, the Lynching of a Guilty (The American Mercury, 2018) is broadcast in audiobook form and goes into great detail listing sources attributed to other high-profile credentialed Jews who make these same dubious claims.
The question we are forced to ask from a cultural and genetic standpoint is why? Even with the evidence, testimony and facts now public, why are so many activist professors willing to besmirch their credibility by so brazenly promoting falsehoods about the case of Leo Frank? What is it about this criminal case that inspires so much self-immolation among academics, researchers, and scholars, who seem so willing to commit the unforgivable crime of academic misconduct?
How widespread is this “hang the Jew” hate crime hoax? Let us explore it in segment 10 of the new 2018 audiobook on the Leo Frank case:
The Leo Frank Case: The Lynching of a Guilty Man, part 9 and 10
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/06/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-10/
FAKE NEWS JOURNALISM AND THE DEAD SHALL RISE
In 2003, Steve Oney published his partisan-stealthy Leo Frank Case tome which was widely labeled with the unofficial title of “definitive work” on the true-crime affair, usurping Leonard Dinnerstein’s pro-Frank pseudo-scholarly monograph which formerly and unofficially held that glorious crowning title, “definitive work” from 1968–2003 — some 35 years. There are other non-fiction works on the case worth mentioning like Phagan-Kean’s book (1987), Robert Seitz Frey’s book (1988) lauded by Abraham Foxman, Melnick (2000), Alphin (2010), the controversial NOI Research Group (2016), Matthew Bernstein’s, and others. Undoubtedly more books will emerge in the years and decades to come, and given all the legal records and newspaper articles from Atlanta have been made accessible online, there are high hopes better analysis will finally emerge and perhaps the web of academic and media lies can finally be torn down.
THE NATION OF ISLAM (NOI)
What a truly bizarre and strange world we live in when a group like NOI — notably anti-White (anti-Gentile) and anti-Jewish — would produce a book that debunks so many myths and outright fabrications of the Frank-Phagan orthodox mythology. More startling, is they specifically name names of prominent people, especially all the Jewish activists who were caught red-handed committing acts of academic misconduct about the Frank-Phagan affair (re: “Hang the Jew Hate Crime Hoax and Mary Phagan Bite-mark Hoax), at a time when the academy is under so much scrutiny for producing many people with enormous student loan debt and seemingly worthless degrees.
Does The Academy Need Serious House Cleaning of it’s Despotic Hawks?
Several non-partisan studies and surveys have been conducted indicating the Academy is lopsided with regressive liberals, cultural Marxists, pro-Apartheid neo-Zionists, and postmodernists. The theme of revenge racism against European-Americans, real or imagined, has been in the spotlight for several decades now and seems to have reached its fevered apogee, but has it peaked or are their greater summits in this vengeful paradigm shift which are still left to be surmounted?
One Trillion Dollars in Student Loan Debt
There are growing voices among university students complaining the academy appears to be producing nothing more than long-marching armies of dittohead postmodernists who are more interested in perpetuating politically correct narratives and debasing Western Civilization, rather than, seeking objectivity, dispassionate historiography, and using the scientific method. New conclusions that are deemed politically incorrect and go against a prevailing manufactured orthodoxy are being suppressed and censored. We make this point as neither a leftist nor rightist view, but for the purpose of bringing the concerns forth repeated adnauseum in student circles, which is this more succinctly: the academy is filled with professors who are churning out millions of automaton zombie-like people with unmarketable degrees and an inability to think critically.
This seemingly monolithic problem of monocular hive-think as described above is especially pronounced concerning the Leo Frank Case as more and more students are coming to the conclusion the claims of widespread anti-Semitism against the defendant were grossly exaggerated and the trial brief of evidence tends to overwhelmingly prove his guilt under 21st-century scrutiny. Only in 2010 were the legal records made public at various web locations. They tell a completely different story than the manufactured Jewish narrative of the case since 1913.
DROP THE ADL #DROPTHEADL AN INTERNATIONAL SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT IS BORN
STUDENTS OF THE LEO FRANK CASE
A multicultural (Black, White, Brown, Shades of Tan, POC) and multi-religion (Atheist, Agnostic, Christian, Jewish and Muslim) group of anonymous concerned students of the Leo Frank case have decided we want to put together an open letter to Anti-Defamation League and Jewish community leaders for them to review, edited by Moses Jacobs and with his commentary, it will be focused on bringing forward concerns about the Frank-Phagan affair and how it is being used in the mainstream regarding sectarian divisions.
LEO FRANK CONFLATION
We believe it is inappropriate, insensitive, irresponsible, and politically hideous that every time a civil rights tragedy occurs or happened in the past, your organization, Anti-Defamation League, tries to make different degrees of conflation with it to the Frank case.
ADL MORALLY REPUGNANT: Conflating a Pedophile with Jewish Holocaust
In the recent past, ADL has tried to conflate the 1913–1915 Leo Frank case that occurred in the America South with the Jewish Holocaust which occurred in Central-Eastern Europe during the 1940s. In the immediate aftermath of the Charlottesville tragedy that occurred August 12, 2017, you Jonathan Greenblatt (link 2 at the top) and ADL (link 3 at the top) are using this event to conflate it with Frank’s lynching. In all of these said instances, there is no equivalency with Leo Frank’s case, and with ADL’s members comparing the hanging of a serial pedophile-rapist with these other tragic events, like the death of ally Heather Heyer, is doing great harm to the people associated with the latter. You are also disrespecting the Phagan family as well by perpetuating Hate Crime hoaxes about people shouting death threats at the judge and jury during the open court of the Frank trial — events that never occurred and represent malicious falsifications of a well-documented trial.
Please STOP using the Leo Frank Case — a true-crime criminal case about a grown man who was convicted of sodomizing and choking to death a little 13-year old girl in 1913 — with the death of a civil rights advocate Heather Heyer in Charlottesville Virginia. There is no comparison, this is absolutely disgusting you would try to use the untimely death of a protester in a car-related accident (people were flying) with the extrajudicial murder of a serial child molester who garroted a little girl in the men’s toilet of the National Pencil Company’s factory in downtown Atlanta, Georgia, 105 years prior.
Leo Frank mutilated Phagan’s body by dragging her face down on the earthen floor of a factory basement to make it look like her sex murder occurred there instead of at the location opposite his business office, which was the metal room. Not only this, but Leo Frank tried to ensnare two black men. One of those black men was totally innocent (Newt Lee) and the other helped the ATL police solve the Phagan sex murder. ADL, your organization has descended into a farce that you would perpetuate the mythos that an innocent Black man committed the crime, when it was all Leo Frank’s doing. Shame on you. #BlackLivesMatter
OPEN LETTER TO ADL ABOUT LEO FRANK
This letter is going to be an evolving rough draft born on August 17th, 2017 and we hope to submit a finalized version of this letter on August 17th, 2018 to your organization.
Please forgive us while the syntax and lexicon are under development, especially for any mistakes, errors and omissions we might make in formulating this letter, as it is going to be a real work in progress and we intend to ask as many people from all political spectra and walks of life to analyze it, for giving constructive criticism on how it can be improved. It is a team effort.
Every word, and sentence in this letter, will be vetted, during this year-long process of its metamorphosis. There will likely be a great deal of revision to it as it takes shape over the forthcoming year, until it’s finalization on August 17th, 2018.
We apologize in advance, if anything within this composite multi-author letter is objectively biased and we will try our best to revise it based on your requests, so that it speaks to the highest within you, from the highest within us, but right now we are very upset with you Jonathan Greenblatt and ADL for conflating the Leo Frank case with the Charlottesville car accident and Shoah. We are hoping you will be open to the idea of not using a serial pedophile and killer-rapist of children for political expediency every-time a civil wrong occurs. It’s just plain weird how often you do it in recent years.
By setting the bar high, it means we will make plenty of mistakes during the evolutionary process of expanding this open letter, but our highest hope is that upon completion, it will be a letter that is worthy of your consideration. Right now it is in the truest sense a nascent rough draft and a very rough one indeed.
First, please forgive us for the strong language of this open letter, but this is a matter of great emotional and intellectual importance to millions of Jewish and Gentile-Americans, primarily in the South, and also the North as well. And for that matter Jews and Gentiles all across Western Civilization and while we’re at it, for good measure, let’s include any concerned citizens of Israel-Palestine too for the sake of fairness and international reach.
ANTI-GENTILE BLOOD LIBEL AND RACIST HATE CRIME HOAX
One of the contentious beliefs of many Gentiles is that the Jewish community has been promulgating a vicious anti-Gentile racist and unconscionable blood-Libel against the European-American community of the South for more than a century, with the claim that generally speaking: Leo Frank was suspected (April 29, 1913), indicted (May 24th, 1913) and convicted (August 25, 1913) because of primarily “widespread” or “rampant” anti-Semitism of the era (the words used on two different Leo Frank monuments, one in Marietta and the other in Queens NY). Many of these same Gentiles believe the exact inverse is the truth because the South has always been largely and overwhelmingly philo-Semitic.
THE SOUTH PHILOSEMITIC NOT ANTISEMITIC
We believe there is overwhelmingly more evidence of White philo-Semitism in the South, than the scant amounts of mostly anecdotal anti-Semitism, and almost non-existent incidents of non-anecdotal anti-Semitism (like the Temple bombing of 1958 that destroyed a 10 foot by 10-foot wall, and severely damaged material inside the adjacent room, but no one was actually hurt or killed in that attack and the person falsely accused was acquitted. The incident might have been yet another hate crime hoax, given the very high prevalence of hate crime hoaxes coming from the Jewish community. This may challenge your sensibilities but given all the hate crime hoaxes today it might as well be true since there is no evidence to the contrary.)
NARRATIVE VERSUS FACTS: HALF OF GEORGIA’S JEWS LEFT THE STATE BECAUSE OF THE LEO FRANK LYNCHING
The Jewish community of the South has steadily grown in population since the late 19th century and early 20th century to the present day, not the opposite. Would this suggest the South was rife with anti-Semitism or the exact opposite? Are Jews known to move in great numbers to regions where anti-Semitism is a pervasive problem? Did Jews move in droves to Nazi Germany during the peak years of WW2 in the 1940s? Prominent Jews featured in ADL sponsored people versus Leo Frank speak of the South being a place where Jews prospered and felt a great sense of community and connection with their Gentile Southern neighbors.
Some students of the Leo Frank case believe the claims by a number of Jewish scholars (like Leonard Dinnerstein), repeated from time to time in other academic writings, that: half of Georgia’s 3,000 Jewish families or residents left the state due to the contentious aftermath of the 1913–1915 Leo Frank case is patently false. Other students of the Leo Frank case believe the above assertion by Jewish scholars to be patently false because census data from 1910 to 1920 is now in the public domain, and there is evidence of the exact opposite regarding the supposed Jewish exodus from Georgia during the post-lynching of Leo Frank. In fact, the population of Jews increased between 1910 and 1920 in Georgia, not the opposite. Between 1910 and 1920 the Jewish population in greater Atlanta nearly doubled. Jews and Gentiles continued to intermarry, and Jews prospered (see interviews in The People versus Leo Frank, 2009, by Jewish-American director-producer Ben Loeterman) in the South, the Leo Frank case did not prevent this prosperity or solidarity of Jews with Gentiles in work and intimate relations, nor did it reverse Jewish demographics.
JEWISH OTHERING AND “US VERSUS THEM”
Some students of the Leo Frank case believe that if this widely held belief among Jews that anti-Semitism created a terrorist climate at the Leo Frank trial is not founded on genuine objective evidence, but falsely on a “them versus us, or us versus them” ‘othering’ canards or tropes, then you, Jonathan Greenblatt, have no veracity for upholding the stated ideals of ADL charter and mission, because you, Jonathan Greenblatt, are choosing for political expediency, to be part of this multigenerational pathological lie that Gentiles turned the Frank trial into a kind of anti-Jewish race hatred show trial (see: ADL National Director Emeritus Abraham Foxman’s 2005 Op-Ed, screen capture provided).
HEATHER HEYER
By conflating the August 2017 death of Heather Heyer, 32, a Virginia paralegal, with the 1915 lynching of a grown man who was a child sex killer, you, Jonathan Greenblatt are defaming the dead. Don’t hideously drag Heather Heyer’s death into Leo Frank’s grave. Heather Heyer did not sodomize, strangle or mutilate any little girls, her life was unbesmirched of any crimes or convictions against children. More than a dozen child laborers at Leo Frank’s factory came forward to reveal that his character for lasciviousness was bad and it is well documented in the Leo Frank trial and his GSC appeals records. We first learn of Leo Frank touching a little girl’s breast and proposition teenage girls with money for sex at the Coroner Paul Donehoo’s inquest held in late April and early May of 1913.
DEWEY HEWELL’S GENITALS WERE MUTILATED
Dewey Hewell, a young girl in her teens came forward to reveal that after Leo Frank seduced and had sex with her, he went down between her legs and bit her so hard on the inner thy adjacent to the genitals that he permanently scarified her. Leo Frank got that girl pregnant during the incident and she was shipped off to a home for unwed mothers, called the ‘Good Sheppard Home’ in Ohio to raise her child without a father.
The above statements have some harsh language in them, but many people are appalled you would try to use Heather Heyer’s death to further your organizations relentless century-long crusade to rehabilitate Leo Frank the Rapist Toilet Strangler, and that being said, it doesn’t mean his lynching wasn’t repulsive in the extreme or unequivocally extrajudicial. All lynching is wrong even for guilty people like Leo Frank. We make no apologies for the lynching of Leo Frank, but he was a guilty child-rapist and sex killer, while Heather Heyer was not, so don’t try to conflate the two. They are worlds apart.
On the 102 anniversary of Leo Frank’s lynching (Re: Time Magazine and ADL website August 18, 2017) PLEASE STOP conflating a murdered rapist-pedophile sex fiend, an event from the early 20th century with modern tragedies that are totally unrelated. You have no idea how disgusting the visceral optics are of both you, Jonathan Greenblatt and your Jewish activist organization, ADL, trying to use the two incidents for advancing your groups political agenda.
APARTHEID STATE OF ISRAEL
Jonathan Greenblatt and ADL, the left is not your natural ally, especially when your activist group has become a PR pubic relations apologist firm for Israel and her relentless crimes against humanity. Do not try to buddy-buddy up with leftists, we are not your allies, we are not your friends, we want nothing to do with your hawkish pro-Israel outreach and PR group, hiding behind your empty mask of respectability. It is obvious you are trying to play leftist politics when you actually support a deadly right-wing extremist nation-state unapologetically, namely Israel.
Defaming the Dead
We apologize for these inconvenient truths, but what you are doing is farthest from acceptable behavior and you are defaming the memory of the dead, namely Miss Heyer and your blatant pro-Israel propaganda is fooling no-one. We’ve read the numerous press releases published on your corporate website excoriating countries that ratify their acceptance of Palestine as a real sovereign country. 70% of the 193 member states of the United Nations have recognized the State of Palestine and you have released statements to the International community scolding those countries. Moreover, your organization’s agenda of rehabilitating Leo Frank the convicted pedophile sex killer has no place in the modern left’s attempts to confront and fight emboldened street fascism and misogyny.
LYNCHING IS INJUSTICE
The lynching of anyone is an injustice no matter what their crime, some of us students of the Leo Frank case say this subjectively because the super-vast majority of us are against both extrajudicial killings and legal state-sanctioned capital punishment. However, Leo M. Frank was not executed by means of hanging at former Sheriff William Frey’s estate on August 17, 1915, because Frank was a Jew, he was hanged because he was convicted for the sex murder of a 13-year-old girl in his factory’s metal room. You’re trying to use Leo Frank’s Jewishness to bully non-Jews and your behavior is racist and atrocious. You’re in for a big surprise if you think the left is your natural ally, we deplore and detest you as much as Nazis for the injustices you commit in Israel on a regular basis.
Do you realize how truly ugly it is to stereotype the whole South as being anti-Semitic when the exact opposite was objectively true? Do you think you’re going to trick the left when Jews benefit from White supremacism? Not going to happen, not today, not ever. We promise you. Your performative civil rights efforts to build an intersectional alliance aren’t fooling anyone anymore and the left no longer wants any part of your fake civil rights organization which at one point tried to stop the U.S. Congress from recognizing the Armenian Genocide and stop a Mosque from being built in downtown Manhattan. Your back-peddling on these matters does not prevent the left from understanding your true nature.
STATE SPONSORED NOT MOB SPONSORED
The men who carried out the most famous lynching in American history were not some mob of lowbrow drunken yahoos, but some of the leading and “most upstanding” citizens of Georgia, many of whom where from the highest echelons of the state government (former Governor Brown participated, former Sheriff William Frey, a sitting judge, current-at-the-time state congressmen and more).
LEO FRANK CLIENT OF GOVERNOR JOHN SLATON’S LAW FIRM
60th Governor of Georgia, John M. Slaton was major partner-owner of the law firm representing Leo Frank at trial. Governor Slaton was law partner of Luther Rosser, the lead counsel for Leo Frank. Rosser served as Leo Frank’s counsel during his 1913 trial and state appeals which concluded in 1914. Are these facts not a bonafide implicit conflict of lawful integrity to the sworn oaths mandated of Governors to both the Georgia and U.S. Constitution, when he commuted his own law firm’s legal customer, Leo Frank? This is Jewish supremacism and White supremacism working hand in hand. Jews benefit from White supremacism, and when it also serves them politically they denounce it. You have become Trojan-horse and double agents of progressive movements. Point blank we’re not going to take it anymore.
JURY RENDERS CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
The prominent former and current members of the Georgia government who lynched Leo Frank felt they were preserving the centuries-old system of trial by jury in the face of a corrupt governor who illegally commuted the death sentence to life in prison of his own customer, Leo Frank. It was, after all, the jury that decided the verdict and death sentence for Frank, when they choose the punishment of “no mercy” (capital punishment) versus “mercy” (life in prison), the governor reversed the jury’s decision. The jury could have chosen mercy and the judge could have downgraded the jury’s death sentence recommendation to life in prison if he felt it would serve the cause of justice, but a corrupt governor undid justice.
JUDGE LEONARD ROAN
The presiding judge Leonard Roan rejected Leo Frank’s post August 27, 1913 appeal for a new trial on 107 grounds. Judge Roan despite handing down a death sentence to Leo Frank, did — for all appearances — give his former law partner Luther Rosser a very lucrative business courtesy though, of the half-winking style, orally stating he was unsure of the defendant’s innocence or guilt, but that he had to defer to the jury’s final decision.
ROAN FORMER ROSSER LAW PARTNER
Judge Roan and Luther Rosser were law partners in the late 19th century, some 15 years prior to the Leo Frank trial. Neither judge Roan or judge Benjamin Hill granted Leo Frank an appeal for a new trial, can you guess why? He was guilty and had a fair trial. Read the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence and listen to the audio book made of it by The American Mercury to get a clue as to why. You can learn about all the facts suppressed by Leo Frank’s partisan defenders over the generations, including yourselves Jonathan Greenblatt and ADL who are part of this tradition.
Roan made sure his statement was oral and not put in writing when the records for appeal went to the Georgia Supreme Court. Moreover, Roan’s rejection of Leo Frank’s request for a new trial paved the way for a Georgia Supreme Court appeal (GSC) and despite the dissenting opinions of the court, the final explicit word of the majority was that the evidence at the Leo Frank trial was sufficient for a verdict of guilty beyond a reasonable doubt (GSC, 1913, 1914). The GSC ratified the guilty verdict of Leo Frank.
CLAIMING LEO FRANK LYNCHED BECAUSE OF ANTISEMITISM IS RACIST AGAINST GENTILES
In 1915, if the leading men who executed Frank only did so because he was a Jew, there would have been too many other easier targets in Atlanta and they wouldn’t have had to go through the agonizing trouble of driving 16 hours round trip, some 170 miles on backstreets, across bumpy pot-hole ridden dirt and mud roads at a top speed of 18 miles an hour, simply put, because the capital of Georgia had many Jewish citizens at the time. Even the Governor Slaton's historical marker near the front of the Atlanta Jewish community history center states in unambiguous terms it was essentially John Slaton’s commutation that played force to Frank’s abduction and lynching.
RACIST ANTIGENTILE MONUMENTS OF HATE
Other historical markers put up by your organization, ADL, at Mount Carmel Cemetery in Queens, NY, and by Rabbi Steven Lebow in Marietta, perpetuate the racist anti-Gentile hate crime hoax that Leo Frank was tried in an atmosphere of anti-Semitism — a totally false and racist blood libel against Gentiles. We demand you put an end to this racist anti-Gentilism and have these hate-mongering monuments and plaques removed.
The ADL 90th anniversary monument at the entryway of the Mount Carmel Cemetery in Queens, NY is promoting this unconscionable racist canard (re: anti-Jewish race prejudice was behind the trial conviction) that Frank was tried in a climate of anti-Semitism and similarly the historical marker at the lynching site (temporarily removed for road expansion) of Leo Frank, also promotes the same ugly false historical narrative that his trial was essentially poisoned by the widespread anti-Semitism in the South at the time. Both claims are categorically false and the trial brief and appeals documents are the final arbitrator, not the multigenerational racist anti-Gentile morality tale weaving its way in the politically correct academy and mainstream media by activist Leo Frank partisan professors and journalists. This includes you Jonathan Greenblatt and ADL.
EMPTY GRAVE BESIDE LEO FRANK
So we ask you, Jonathan Greenblatt, to go to the Mount Carmel Cemetery in Queens, NY, and look at the grave to the immediate left of Leo Frank’s grave that was reserved for Lucille Selig, his wife. Have you ever been there before and given it a second thought as to why it still remains empty today? And if you have a suspicion this is not true about it being empty, please, by all means, go to the front cemetery office building near the grand entry and ask if that grave-plot of land at the left side, adjacent to Frank’s grave is empty or not, because it is undeniably empty of human remains! If you want more than just an oral statement of this fact from the staff, you can write the cemetery a letter and they will put it in writing for you on letterhead as they have for others, including us students who are writing to you this letter.
Frank’s own wife did not want to be buried next to him, she instead chose cremation via her last will and testament (notarized in 1954, three years before her passing on April 23rd, 1957). According to Steve Oney who interviewed Lucille’s nephews (Georgia Magazine, Features, March 2004), she asked her family to have her remains stay in Atlanta, quote:
I spent several hours up the road in St. Petersburg with Alan and Fanny Marcus, two Atlantans who’d retired to Florida. Alan was Lucille Frank’s nephew. He’d grown up at her knee…. Following Lucille’s death in 1957, her body was cremated. She wanted her ashes scattered in a public park, but an Atlanta ordinance forbade it. For the next six years, the ashes sat in a box at Patterson’s Funeral Home. One day, Alan received what for him was an upsetting call. The ashes needed to be disposed of… For months, he carried Lucille’s remains around Atlanta in the trunk of his red Corvair. Early one morning in 1964, he and his brother drove downtown to Oakland Cemetery. There, under the cover of the gray dawn light, the two men buried this martyred figure in an unmarked plot between the headstones of her parents.
End Quote.
If you have any doubts about her Last Will and Testament they are a matter of permanent state record in Georgia (We refuse under any circumstance to openly publish its contents here out of respect for anyone mentioned in it’s bequeathing who might have living heirs, but you can do your own due diligence if you have any doubts as to its unambiguous contents and acquire it in Atlanta.)
Cremation might be more common among faithful Jews in 2017 than in 1957, but it was uncommon for a religiously active Jewess in the 1950s, especially from a family who two generations prior founded the first synagogue in Atlanta. Does it not look to be a way of uncomfortably saving-face as to why she didn’t want to be buried beside Leo Frank in that grave reserved for her in Queens, NY? Do you really think she wanted her remains to spend there for all eternity next to a man who betrayed his marital vows of sexual monogamy? Do you think Lucille Selig wasn’t aware of Dewey Hewell who was sexually mutilated and carried Leo Frank’s love-child?
DOES LOYALTY HAVE IT’S LIMITS?
Jonathan Greenblatt, does even loyalty have its limits? Can you speculate, conjecturing to read between those lines of her notarized will and surmise what that might have ultimately meant? Maybe if you read State Exhibit J in the Leo Frank trial brief it would give you some possible clues, if you’re willing to consider maybe the police didn’t torture the Selig-Frank family’s African-American daytime cook, Magnolia “Minola” McKnight, you might get an idea or two, why she didn’t want to be buried next to him. It wasn’t just because Leo Frank was a philandering misogynist who was a predatory pedophile and was committing adultery on Lucille behind her back on the Sabbath. She knew he had killed Mary Phagan and her decision not to be interred next to him is vindication for State Exhibit J, stenographed on June 3rd, 1913.
STATE’S EXHIBIT J, Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence, 1913.
An affidavit executed by Minola McKnight for Solicitor Dorsey, as follows:
The state of Georgia, County of Fulton.
Personally appeared before me, a notary public in and for the above
State and county, Minola McKnight, who lives in the rear of 351 Pulliam St.,
Atlanta, Ga., who being duly sworn deposes and says:
On Saturday morning, April 26, 1913, Mr. [Leo] Frank left home about
eight o’clock, and Albert [McKnight], my husband, was there Saturday, too.
Albert [McKnight] got there I guess about a quarter after one [1:15 PM] and
he [Albert McKnight] was there when Mr. [Leo] Frank come for dinner (Dinner is what they called Lunch back then, it was a hot meal), which was about half-past one [1:30 PM], but Mr. Frank did not eat any dinner (Lunch), and he left in about ten minutes [1:40 PM] after he [Mr. Leo Frank] got there.
Mr. [Leo] Frank come back to the house at seven o’clock that night, and Albert
[McKnight] was there when he [Leo Frank] got there. Albert [McKnight] had gone home that [early] evening but he comes back. I don’t know what time he [Albert McKnight] got there, but he comes sometime before Mr. [Leo] Frank did, and Mr. [Leo] Frank eat supper about seven o’clock, and when I left there that night about eight o’clock, I left Mr. [Leo] Frank there.
Sunday morning [April 27th, 1913] I got there about eight o’clock, and there was an automobile standing in front of the house and I didn’t pay any attention to it. I saw a man in the automobile get a bucket of water and pour into it. Mr. [Leo] Frank’s wife [Lucille Selig Frank] was downstairs and Mr. [Emil Selig] and Mrs. [Josephine] Selig were upstairs. Albert [McKnight] was there Sunday morning, but I don’t remember what time he got there. I called them down to breakfast about half past eight [8:30 AM] and I found out that Mr. [Leo] Frank was gone.
Mr. [Emil] Selig and Mrs. [Josephine] Selig eat breakfast, but Mrs. [Lucille] Frank didn’t eat until Mr. Frank come back and then they eat breakfast together. I didn’t hear them say anything at the breakfast table. After dinner, I understood them to say that a girl and Mr. [Leo] Frank were caught at the office Saturday. I don’t know who said it, Miss Lucile (Mrs. Frank) and
Mr. [Emil Selig] and Mrs. [Josephine] Selig and Mr. [Leo] Frank were standing there talking, after dinner when they said it; I understood them to say it was a Jew girl.
On Tuesday [April 29th, 1913], Mr. [Leo] Frank says to me, ‘It is mighty bad Minola, I might have to go to jail about this girl, and I don’t know anything about it.’
Sunday [April 27th, 1913], Miss Lucile said to Mrs. Selig that Mr. Frank didn’t rest so good Saturday night [April 26th 1913]; she said he was drunk and wouldn’t let her sleep with him, and she said she slept on the floor on the rug by the bed because Mr. [Leo] Frank was drinking.
Miss Lucile [Mrs. Lucille Frank] said [on] Sunday [April 27th 1913] that Mr. [Leo] Frank told her Saturday night [April 26th, 1913] that he was in trouble, and that he didn’t know the reason why he would murder, and he told his wife to get his pistol and let him kill himself.
I heard Miss Lucile [Mrs. Lucille Frank] say that to Mrs. [Josephine] Selig, and it got away with Mrs. [Josephine] Selig mighty bad; she didn’t know what to think. I haven’t heard Miss Lucile say whether she believed it or not. I don’t know why Mrs. [Lucille] Frank didn’t come to see her husband [Leo Frank], but it was a pretty good while before she would come to see him, maybe two weeks. She would tell me, ‘Wasn’t it mighty bad that he was locked up,’ she would say, ‘Minola, I don’t know what I am going to do.’
When I left home to go to the solicitor general’s office [Hugh Dorsey], they told me to mind how I talked. They pay me $3.50 a week, but last week they paid me $4.00, and one week she paid me $6.50. Up to the time of the murder I was getting $3.50 a week and the week right after the murder I don’t remember how much she paid me, and the next week they paid me $3.50, and the next week they paid me $6.50, and the next week they paid me $4.00 and the next week they paid me $4.00. One week, I don’t remember which one, Mrs. Selig gave me $5, but it wasn’t for my work, and they didn’t tell me what it was for, she just said, ‘ Here is $5, Minola.’ I understood that it was a tip for me to keep quiet. They would tell me to mind how I talked and Miss Lucile [Mrs. Lucille Selig Frank] gave me a hat.”
Question: “Is that the reason you didn’t tell the solicitor [Hugh Dorsey] yesterday all about this, that Miss Lucile and the others had told you not to say anything about what happened at home there’?”
Answer: “Yes, sir.”
Question: “Is that true?”
Answer: “Yes, sir.”
Question: “And that’s the reason you would rather have been locked up last night than tell?’”
Answer: “Yes, sir.”
Question: “Has Mr. Pickett or Mr. Cravens or Mr. Campbell or myself influenced you in any way or threatened you in any way to make this statement? ”
Answer: “No, sir.”
Question: “You make it of your own free will and accord in their presence and in the presence of Mr. Gordon, your attorney?”
Answer: “Yes, sir.”
(Signed) MINOLA McKNIGHT.
Sworn to and subscribed before me, this 3d day of June, 1913.
(Signed) G. C. FEBUARY, Notary public, Fulton County, Ga.
End of Deposition / Affidavit.
Torture and Coercion
Leo Frank’s defenders, then and now, have long claim Minola was tortured or coerced to produce State’s Exhibit J. However, concerning the veracity of State’s Exhibit J, one should consider State’s Exhibit B, and why Leo Frank so thoughtfully bought Lucille Selig Frank a two pound box of Chocolates at Jacobs Pharmacy on Saturday, April 26, 1913, at 6:15 pm, just minutes before catching the 6:20pm trolly home, to his in-laws residence at 68 East Georgia Avenue, Atlanta. Leo Frank claimed in State Exhibit B that he arrived home at about 6:30 pm.
The affidavit of Magnolia’s husband Albert McKnight set off a chain of events that revealed what was said behind closed doors at the Frank-Selig residence after Leo Frank was arrested. So we ask you again does Lucille Selig’s desire to not be by her husband’s side in death not vindicate the veracity of State exhibit J?
EMBODIMENT OF UNAMERICAN EVIL
The Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith is now part of the digital age book-burning style censorship going on at YouTube, Amazon, and Google — even worse their evil is spreading across the Internet at large. You ADL, have made great efforts to have any negative articles about your organization expunged from news websites on the Internet, but surprise-surprise there are secret backups everywhere. We honestly thought you would be more sensitive and thoughtful regarding the modern day equivalent of book burning and erasing political ideas, podcasts, radio programs, and videos down the memory hole, given what occurred less than a century ago in Germany with book burning, followed by people burning. Is this the lesson of history ADL teaches that no matter who comes to power they will oppress others?
MANUFACTURED CONSENSUS
It’s un-American to the highest level and deepest core of the bill of rights that you would claim to be a civil right organization but suppress ideas of other peoples that don’t agree with your… what appears to be a self-serving narrative, or tow the orthodox political correctness of the popular culture created by members of the academy and mainstream media. The left is no longer going to tolerate your intolerance. You are not going to hide behind Hitler on our watch anymore. You are not going to get away with using the scare-words Anti-Semitism, Anti-Semitic or Anti-Semite as racial epithets any longer.
Barring ad hominem and doxing for implicit fear-mongering purposes, there are no ideas above scrutiny and discussion. There are no historical events sacred, or unworthy of exploration, revisionism, inquiry, criticism, discussion, and debate. In a truly free and civilized society, there are no dogmas or sacred cows above intellectual challenge or inquiry. In this age of extreme political violence, we have seen nothing but dehumanizing terms being relentlessly thrown back and forth by opposing groups who refuse to challenge each other’s preconceived notions and basic assumptions.
Your organization is at the center of dehumanizing others with pejoratives as a political tactic and strategy (just look at your own writings and the ADL website, you love to bandy about dehumanizing terms against people with opposing views).
When people stop talking and resort to name calling it is when violence begins and we the students of the Leo Frank case are against all political violence, we believe in discussion without doxing or adhominem, not violence. You have been successful in getting lots of material removed from the Internet when such works are exposing the guilt of Leo Frank, but you are few and we the students of the Leo Frank case are many.
When Dialogue Ends, Violence Begins
Your organization's efforts to manipulate all of the powerful internet behemoths is instigating violence and you are partly responsible for the bloody civil war that is brewing in America because of your efforts to revoke public discourse. Shame on you.
INTERNET MONOPOLIES
Yes, Google and YouTube are two parts of a single private company, but they also have a virtual monopoly on Search engines and video sharing, with roughly 70% of all searches going through them. Moreover, that you would choose to use your political power to deplatform people on a plethora of social media and internet tools is truly ugly beyond all imagination.
Are we witnessing WW2 style authoritarian history rhyme and echo?
Do you really want to mimic the world where people who don’t hold certain ideas eventually have their lives destroyed or worse end up in concentration camps? Have we all (referring to all those at the vanguard of promoting censorship) become so thinned skinned and intellectually bankrupt that we now have to walk on eggshells and live under politically correct censorship, doxing, ad hominem, suppression of ideas or beliefs, and political violence? Does this not strike you as hideous that we are in the midst of what looks like the beginnings of a civil war? You’re directly in the center of this civil war with your censorship and deplatforming efforts. The world will not forget or forgive your efforts to criminalize ideas and free speech.
JUST SAY NO TO CIVIL WAR
We the students of the Leo Frank case are absolutely terrified by the prospects of a civil war, especially since the last one resulted in 600K deaths when the United States was hardly populated relatively-speaking compared to the present. Our (students of the Leo Frank case) stomachs churn with nausea at the idea of another civil war that could result in millions of deaths. We are quickly headed in this direction and your organization is greatly to blame.
CENSORSHIP IS AN ACT OF WAR AGAINST CIVILIZATION
Civilization begins and ends with talking, constructive criticism, and open dialogue, not echo chambers and monologues. This climate of censorship you are creating behind the ruse of hate speech is creating a situation where people are beginning to believe that only through political violence can they get their message across, and it’s coming from all sides, it’s not just the Nazis, Fascists, Extremist, Commies, Pinkos, Alt-Left, Regressive Leftists, Jewish Supremacists, White Supremacists, Pedophile Terrorists or other sometimes misused dehumanizing terms being over-used by you and others to describe one side of the many-sided sectarian conflict. The specific dehumanizing terms your organization are using on a regular basis is not helping to foster understanding between people with opposing world views.
100 DISCUSSION FORUMS AND BLOGS
I have no doubts you will possibly/probably censor, suppress, shadow-ban or delete this open letter, no problem, we’ll just hire a team of Indians and Pakistanis to post it on the top 100 most visited blogs and discussion forums when this letter is finalized on August 17, 2018, one year from its 2017 inception. Hopefully, it will be polished nicely by that time. Maybe by then, it will have evolved into multiple open letters, a full series. If this open letter fails to get good viewership, we will publish it in the top 100 most visited political forums and blogs. If that doesn’t do the trick, another 100 history forums and blogs should suffice. The Internet is wide open, and any censorship attempts by your organization will be dealt with by posting this work to more locations.
We will not be censored by ADL or SPLC. We will not be silenced by ADL or SPLC.
LOOK DEEP INTO YOUR DARK SOULS AND STONE HEARTS
If there is even one inclining of universal justice in your soul, you will actually read the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence and see that it absolutely was not anti-Semitism that convicted him. Leo Frank was convicted because a mountain of circumstantial and forensic evidence was duly presented at his trial, including a newfangled change to his alibi given on the witness stand (August 18, 1913) by Leo Frank, where he placed himself exactly where the prosecution theorized and proposed to the jury that the crime had occurred in time and space (namely the metal room at the back of the second level of the factory where the only set of toilets existed on that floor, the floor where Leo Frank and Mary Phagan both worked, one at the front section, the other in the back section).
BLOOD DRIED HAIR AT CRIME SCENE
Hair tangled on the handle of a lathe in the metal room (second floor) was found the Monday morning after the Saturday noontime crime. The man who discovered the tress (R.P. Barrett) reported the forensic evidence at the coroner’s inquest (April 30, 1913 — May 8th,1913), and he said it had dried blood on it (see Coroner’s inquest testimony, Atlanta Constitution, late April, early May 1913).
You can read Georgia appeals records about the Leo Frank defense team literally trying to bribe everyone and anyone they could (see the affidavits in Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court files, 1913, 1914), so is there a chance some of those people bribed wouldn’t come forward to admit it?
Audiobook: Leo Frank Sits Upon the Witness Stand at his Trial.
Leo Frank was not an innocent man, he was convicted beyond a reasonable doubt and the evidence presented against him then, would still convict him today by any reasonable jury who was not blinded by real anti-Gentile bigotry or false accusations of anti-Semitic bigotry, like you clearly for the prior seem to give the impression of strongly, with your partisan articles published at Medium www.Medium.com and Time Magazine www.Time.com concerning the Frank case (August 17th 2016, August 17th 2017).
Have you ever considered in your quest to fight anti-Semitism that you are actually manufacturing anti-Gentilism and perpetuating the racist hate crime hoax promulgating “Leo Frank’s trial was an anti-Semitic conviction by an anti-Semitic mob-terrorize jury”? Is this the disingenuous historical legacy you wish to partake to create divisions between Jews and Gentiles?
Regardless of whatever you may think about our harsh criticism, we are asking you Jonathan Greenblatt, Abraham Foxman, Staff of ADL, Jewish garden variety alphabet soup, leading Gentile citizens and the Jewish community at large, to please try being uncompromisingly open-minded, and listen to the entire Leo Frank Case audio book series at The American Mercury and then fact check what is being said there by looking closely and carefully at the official legal records of the case, state and federal. There is no racism or rancor or anti-Semitism in The American Mercury’s audio book series on the Leo Frank trial. If there is, point it out specifically, but trying to get the website censored causes many people to think you’re organization is intellectually and morally bankrupt, and really, all things considered, you have no evidence that anti-Semitism was behind Leo Frank’s conviction.
The 1913 Atlanta newspaper accounts (Atlanta Journal, Atlanta Georgian, Atlanta Constitution) of the Frank-Phagan affair are available at the Leo Frank Research Library and they are in the process of being meticulously transcribed from the microfilm-to-PDFs that have made their way onto the interwebs into text format posts so they can be indexed and searched for data mining. We encourage you to read those reports from April 28th, 1913 to August 31st, 1913 at The Leo Frank Research Library http://www.LeoFrank.info
Most of the claims of mob terrorism poisoning the trial are then and now grossly overstated, but these false claims were so intensely repeated in Adolph Ochs’ New York Times as what we would call today fake news, even an appeals jurist at the time so long ago during 1913–1915, tended to believe the newspaper reports and one member gave them some credence.
There absolutely was no one shouting anti-Semitic death threats at the judge and jury into the open windows of the Leo Frank trial during the daily proceedings as falsely claimed by Abraham Foxman (ADL Website, 2005) and Dr. Leonard Dinnerstein claims (American Jewish Archive Journal, 1968).
Leonard Dinnerstein after 48 years of promoting this anti-Gentile hate crime hoax and falsehood about people screaming anti-Semitic death chants into the courtroom windows finally admitted the evidence was insufficient, at least privately according to one of the students of our group that wrote the majority of the Leo Frank Wikipedia article. Moreover, this student stated he contacted Dinnerstein in circa December 2014 to ask for the definitive answer about the rumors of people shouting chants “Hang the Jew” outside the courtroom and finally got what is an amazing reversal. Dinnerstein said the evidence was insufficient. While Dinnerstein is still alive, we ask you to contact him about this claim.
REVERSAL REQUESTED
We are asking you Jonathan Greenblatt and Abraham Foxman for a reversal and stoppage of the racist anti-Gentile hoax about the claims that mobs of people shouted anti-Semitic death chants into the open courtroom windows that could easily be heard in the courtroom of the trial proceedings (see screen capture of ADL website of Abraham Foxman’s racist anti-Gentile hate crime hoax).
A 21st-century open inquiry into the Leo Frank case is long overdue, one that is calm and dispassionate from fair-minded third-party folks recruited from every walk of life across the nation. Beginning now, non-partisan people should be sought out for this exercise in truth-seeking. It is not a biased or partisan statement to say the prosecution side of the case tends to be seldom given a full and meticulous hearing over the last 50 years or even 100 years for that matter.
We are asking you to take the lead in an open inquiry in 2017 and going forward in 2018 to give the Leo Frank case a totally brand spanking new assessment with no political, religious, racial or sectarian agendas, with no goals other than the unbiased truth. First comes the facts, then comes the conclusions, not the other way around as Jewish-American professor A. Koenigsberg once quipped.
We the students of the Leo Frank case are requesting proof that anti-Semitism was the reason Leo Frank was convicted, not anecdotal claims, rumors or allegations, but hard proof of it. The Leo Frank case is one of the most well documented legal cases of early 20th century America, not just in the mainstream press of Atlanta, but in the official legal records that number more than 2,500 pages when state and federal appeals are combined. The Leo Frank brief of evidence survived in it’s entirety to the present day, so did all the newspaper reports from Atlanta, let us begin an open inquiry into them, dispassionately, and without ad hominem, rancor or racism.
Jonathan Greenblatt, as a new leader of the very well-funded ADL, you have access to the best lawyers money can buy (given the tendency of supersensitiveness of you and your organization, we mean nothing anti-Semitic by that either, we’re just stating a fact), we implore you to have the official primary source records vetted by a team of dispassionate legal scholars from all walks of life in the present.
We believe men and women who are unbiased academic researchers and seasoned jurists with the motivation to give both sides a full fair hearing is long overdue. The prosecution side is seldom ever given a fair hearing in modern times and it deserves a closer examination without ad hominem, censorship, befogging, misrepresentation, suppression, partisan spin, and cherry-picking. Why is there so much fear in making all the evidence of Leo Frank’s case public and having an open conversation about it?
You have the power to continue to double down and falsely accuse the social and political climate in 1913 Georgia of being pervasively anti-Semitic, but the Old and New South of that era was never anti-Semitic to any significant degree — if you disagree we would love to see the evidence of this widespread anti-Semitism that poisoned the Frank trial. This shouldn’t be misconstrued to mean the old-new South wasn’t clearly discriminatory and racist against Blacks, no one can deny that fact, neither the mainstream left or mainstream right disputes this reality of history about Blacks being treated as second-class citizens. However, Jews regularly married Gentiles in the South and they still do today, the census records from 1940 and prior are now public domain. Every decade henceforth new census data will be made available. Marriages between Jews and Gentiles are very common today in the South, some 50% of Jews intermarry in many cities in the American South (just ask Leo Frank advocate Rabbi Lebow and Debbie Wasserman Shultz if you don’t believe it).
Fringe Neo-Nazi, KKK and Fascist groups, which are tiny in numbers, do not represent the opinions of the great majority of Southerners and if you have any doubts ask the Rabbis of Atlanta and the greater South, more and more of them are being asked if they are willing to marry interfaith couples.
The KKK
The KKK has only a few hundred members nationwide (not the exaggerated numbers in the thousands the SPLC claims). The KKK has no political power today and they are abhorred by both the left and right as goofy clowns in silken ghost suits. Moreover, the idea that grown men would dress up like ghosts in shiny silk sheets is just publicly embarrassing and beyond the pale, same goes for Nazis marching in the street in LARPing (live-action role play) uniform, they’re minuscule in number and abhorred by the great majority of Americans who have or know someone whose relatives had fought in WW2. 410,000 Americans died during WW2 to prevent the total expulsion and death of Jews from Western Europe.
We encourage you to take a second look at the dry leaves of the Georgia Supreme Court records of Leo Frank’s appeals. You might be shocked to discover that anti-Semitism has a correlation with anti-Gentilism, something that only requires ego suppression and intellectual honesty to explore. The cause celebre the Jewish community made of the Frank case in the national press, led by efforts from Jewish-American press mogul Adolph Ochs and Jewish-American Advertising magnate Albert D. Lasker, coupled with the subornation of perjury well documented in the State appeals records are no longer uncharted territory thanks to the Interwebs.
Now, you can read about all the juicy details in the 1913–1914 Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court files, they’re at the Leo Frank Research Library.
Lasker’s Cynical Crusade
Regrettably even the Nation of Islam, has dug up the Albert D. Lasker estate papers in Illinois, and allegedly Lasker, who was one of Frank’s major supporters, called Frank a supercilious, pervert and megalomaniac (The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3, 2016) and if this anti-Semitic pseudo-scholarship is false, lets dig up the Lasker estate papers housed at the University of Illinois and expose them to the light of day (Regrettably the Nation of Islam turned out to be right about Lasker). The records are publicly available. You’re in for a big surprise, if you ever read the ADL report commissioned in the 1950s housed at the American Jewish Archives in Cinci, Ohio, you will learn about some of the shenanigans caused by Leo Frank’s Jewish supporters and it doesn’t make it anti-Semitic to re-point out facts gathered by ADL reports either.
The American Mercury has produced an audiobook of Mary Kean’s 1987 book The Murder of Little Mary Phagan and 100 Reasons Leo Frank is Guilty, but you, Jonathan Greenblatt, deleted an audio version of the latter when it was posted in direct response to your August 17th, 2016 Leo Frank article published on Medium.com last year, why no open dialogue? Why no inquiry into the facts of the case from the primary sources?
We encourage you to listen to it again, after taking a closer look at the Leo Frank trial brief of evidence, if you are willing and able to do so, it can be found at The American Mercury through citation links (see links below).
We hope to some infinitesimal degree we have appealed to your intellectual curiosity to seek out the truth, even if it turns out to be an inconvenient truth that Frank’s trial was not a conviction based on anti-Semitism.
Please be fair-minded and look into these matters, no matter what you think about what we wrote to you here.
The monument at the Mount Carmel Cemetery accusing 1913 Gentile Southerners of a kind of pervasive anti-Semitism is a blood-libel pure and simple, if the charge of kangaroo court racial hatred is in fact false history. I think you know in your heart of hearts when you look at the facts of the case it wasn’t anti-Semitism which convicted Leo Frank, but you continue to attack Gentiles with anti-Gentilic rhetoric over it.
We the students of the Leo Frank criminal affair believe ADL has been propounding false history and fake news about the case for many generations. We have yet to see ADL or anyone for that matter produce objective examples of widespread anti-Semitism in the old south, only unsubstantiated claims of it have been propounded, with no significant examples. The long arc of truth is Leo Frank was convicted because of the evidence, not because of his ethnoreligion Judaism. You are doing a great disservice to humanity perpetuating artificial narratives about blood libels, canards, and tropes against Gentiles.
None of what we said exculpates the homicide committed by people who strangled Leo Frank to death on August 17, 1915, but keep in mind, that sometimes prison inmates (with homicidal pedophiles being the most common) are unfortunately killed in the most unexpected and horrifying ways, but that doesn’t overturn their convictions and guilt after all their appeals were exhausted and Leo Frank had fully exhausted all of his state and federal appeals. We could cite many dozen ghoulish murders of convicted killers in prison, but what point would it serve? The lynching was hideous indeed, but that does not exonerate him. Moreover many thousands of people who were convicted of sex crimes and murder were often lynched (regrettably) or hanged by the judicial system. Leo Frank’s lynching or hanging was not really atypical for a convicted sex killer, other than your insistence of playing up the racial and religious angle.
Leo Frank is still as of 2017 officially recognized as guilty and we have no doubts the efforts to have him exonerated are still underway behind the scenes.
In 2015, Rabbi Steven Lebow was able to recruit a number of leading activist judges and jurists in Georgia to hold a press conference petitioning the Governor of Georgia Nathan Deal and the state congress/legislature to exonerate Leo Frank, they refused. Are they anti-Semitic? No, the facts of the case speak for themselves. The legal records are finally live online since 2010. The trial of Frank and his appeals speak for themselves in terms of his guilt being something which could never be reasonably overturned.
Let’s get Leo Frank Exonerated?
When Leo Frank was illegally pardoned in 1986, he was not officially absolved of the Phagan murder. If you have evidence Leo Frank was objectively convicted because of anti-Semitism, then we are willing to work with you towards his exoneration, otherwise you are perpetuating ugly anti-Gentilism, instigating a Jewish-Gentile civil war and Frank’s pardon in 1986 is an injustice that is now 31 years old. The great injustice is on Mary Phagan’s behalf, the little girl he sodomized, strangled and mutilated because of the illegal pardon in 1986 and false claims of trial anti-Semitism which persist today. What is more ugly is the anti-Gentile, anti-Black, anti-Southern racist attempt by Jewish scholars to frame the murder on the African-American janitor, Jim Conley, when there is no sufficient evidence for it.
Our Sincerest Regards,
Moses Jacobs and Students of the Leo Frank Case
PS: According to Paul Berger of The Jewish Daily Forward (Leo Frank Case Stirs Debate 100 Years After Jewish Lynch Victim’s Conviction, August 30, 2013):
Cahan traveled to Atlanta in March 1914 to visit Frank in his cell [in “The Tower”]. In the fifth volume of Cahan’s memoirs, published in Yiddish in 1931, Cahan relates that Frank told him the Atlanta police were desperate for a conviction. Mary Phagan’s murder presented a huge challenge for prosecutor Hugh Dorsey, who had just come off the back of two embarrassing courtroom defeats.
“Anti-Semitism is absolutely not the reason for this libel that has been framed against me,” [Leo] Frank told [Abraham] Cahan. “It isn’t the source nor the result of this sad story.”
Sincerely,
Moses Jacobs and Students of the Leo Frank Case
FURTHER READING AND REFERENCES
More well-reasoned analysis that Leo Frank had a fair trial and was convicted because of the evidence, not anti-Semitism.
The Coroner Paul Donehoo’s Inquest:
The Coroner’s Inquest Into The Mary Phagan’s Murder Mystery, April 30th, 1913 — May 8th,1913.
Text: http://theamericanmercury.org/2015/08/leo-frank-the-coroners-inquest/
The Trial of Leo Frank: Audiobook and Text
Introduction — 100 Years Ago Today: The Trial of Leo Frank Begins, July 28, 1913.
Text: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/07/100-years-ago-today-the-trial-of-leo-frank-begins/
1 — Week One of the Leo Frank Trial, Atlanta Georgia, Summer of 1913,
Text and Audiobook: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/the-leo-frank-trial-week-one/
2 — Week Two of the Leo Frank Trial, Atlanta Georgia, Summer of 1913,
Text and Audiobook: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/the-leo-frank-trial-week-two/
3 — Week Three of the Leo Frank Trial, Atlanta Georgia, Summer of 1913,
Text and Audiobook: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/the-leo-frank-trial-week-three/
Main Event — One Hundred Years Ago Today, Leo Frank Mounts the Witness Stand During the Mary Phagan Murder Trial on Monday, August 18, 1913, Auxillary Fulton County Courthouse, Atlanta Georgia,
Text and Audiobook: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/08/100-years-ago-today-leo-frank-takes-the-stand
4 — Week Four of the Leo Frank Trial, Atlanta Georgia, Summer of 1913,
Text and Audiobook: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/09/the-leo-frank-trial-week-four/
Perorations of Counselors:
Leo Frank Trial Closing Arguments, August 21st, 1913: Luther Rosser, Reuben Arnold and Frank Hooper, 1913,
Text: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/10/the-leo-frank-trial-closing-arguments-of-hooper-arnold-and-rosser/
Closing Arguments of Prosecutor Hugh Dorsey at the Leo Frank Trial, August 22, 23, 25, 1913 (No Court on Sunday, August 24, 1913),
Text: http://theamericanmercury.org/2013/12/the-leo-frank-trial-closing-arguments-solicitor-dorsey
The Most Widely Read Internet Analysis of The Leo Frank Case — One Hundred Reasons Leo Frank Is Guilty by Penelope Lee and B.L. Huie
Audio: https://theamericanmercury.org/2017/09/new-audio-book-the-american-mercury-on-leo-frank-100-reasons-leo-frank-is-guilty
Text: https://theamericanmercury.org/2013/04/100-reasons-proving-leo-frank-is-guilty/
Now an Audio Book: Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Volume 3: Leo Frank: The Lynching of a Guilty Man by Nation of Islam (NOI) Research Group (29 Separate Audiobook).
WWW: https://theamericanmercury.org/tag/the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man/
The Leo Frank Research Archive — More Than 10,000 Pages of Related Research Media About the Rape-Strangulation Case of Mary Phagan and Lynching of Sex Killer Leo Max Frank.
WWW Link: http://www.leofrank.info
Background Material for this Article:
Link 1 August 17, 2016: https://medium.com/@J0NATHAN_G/the-living-memory-of-a-lynching-119cc584020
Link 2 August 17, 2017: http://time.com/4905006/adl-charlottesville-white-supremacy-nazis-leo-frank/
Link 3, August 17, 2017: https://www.adl.org/blog/we-must-grapple-with-history-to-move-forward
Primary Sources of the Frank-Phagan True Crime:
The Leo Frank Case: Inside Story of Georgia’s Greatest Murder Mystery, 1913 — This is the first neutral book ever written about the murder of Mary Phagan and the trial of Leo Frank.
WWW Link: https://archive.org/details/LeoFrankCaseAtlantaGeorgiaGreatestMurderMystery1913_201503
The Murder of Little Mary Phagan by Mary Phagan Kean Written by Mary Phagan Kean, the great grand-niece of Mary Phagan. This semi-autobiographical and neutral account of the events surrounding the trial and appeals of Leo Frank include never before published detailed information about Frank’s posthumous pardon. This insightful book is well worth reading and it’s a refreshing change from the endless number of Jewish authored modern and contemporary books, disingenuously transforming the Leo Frank case into a neurotic, anti-Gentile, ethnoreligious-obsessed tabloid controversy.
WWW Link: https://theamericanmercury.org/2015/12/new-audio-book-the-murder-of-little-mary-phagan
American State Trials, volume X (1918) by John Davison Lawson tends to be biased in favor of Leo Frank and his legal defense team. This case commentary review provides an *abridged* version of the Brief of Evidence, leaving out some of the important testimony and evidence when it republishes parts of the trial testimony digest. Be sure to read the abridged closing arguments of Luther Zeigler Rosser, Reuben Rose Arnold, Frank Arthur Hooper, and Hugh Manson Dorsey. For a more complete version of the Leo M. Frank trial testimony, read the 1913 Leo Frank Case Brief of Evidence and Atlanta’s daily newspapers publishing the question and answer portions (July 28-August 21, 1913).
The argument of Hugh M. Dorsey in the Trial of Leo Frank. Some but not all of the 9 hours of arguments given to the Jury at the end of the Leo Frank trial on August 22, 23, and 25, 1913. Only a dozen or so libraries in the United States have copies of this peroration in book format. This is an excellent book and required reading for students of the Leo Frank case to see how prosecutor Hugh Dorsey, in sales vernacular, ‘closed’ the panel of 13 men (the trial jury of 12 men plus Judge Leonard Strickland Roan).
WWW Link: https://archive.org/details/AmericanStateTrials1918VolumeX_201609
The Leo Frank Trial Brief of Evidence (1913):
Leo M. Frank, Plaintiff in Error, vs. the State of Georgia, Defendant in Error. In Error from Fulton Superior Court at the July Term 1913, Brief of Evidence. Only a few original copies of this 300-page book-digest from 1913 and 1914 exist at the Georgia State Archive. This trial digest can also be found in the Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court files.
Leo Frank’s defenders often misrepresent these trial legal documents and examples can be found in the most popular books about the Leo Frank case by Steve Oney, Leonard Dinnerstein, Robert Seitz Frey, Elaine Marie Alphin, the Samueles’ and other Frankites. Since the Leo Frank (BOE — brief of evidence) was released on the Internet, the number of books by pro-Frank extremists falsifying the trial testimony has diminished greatly.
WWW Link: https://archive.org/details/LeoM.FrankPlaintiffInErrorVs.StateOfGeorgiaDefendantInError.In
Three Major Atlanta Dailies of the Time: The Atlanta Constitution, The Atlanta Journal and The Atlanta Georgian. The most relevant daily reports, concerning the Phagan murder investigation and the Leo Frank trial, are documented between April 28th to August 27th, 1913.
WWW Link: http://www.leofrank.info
Atlanta Constitution daily newspaper: The Murder of Mary Phagan, Coroner’s Inquest, Grand Jury, Investigation, Pre-Trial Discovery, Trial, Appeals, Prison Shanking and Lynching reported about the Phagan-Frank Case in the Atlanta Constitution Daily Newspaper from 1913 to 1915.
WWW Link: http://www.leofrank.info
Atlanta Georgian daily newspaper (Lot’s of Extras): covering the Leo Frank Case from late April through August 1913.
WWW Link: http://www.leofrank.info
Atlanta Journal daily newspaper (evening edition): April 28, 1913, through till the end of August 1913, pertaining to articles about the Leo Frank Case.
WWW Link: http://www.leofrank.info
The most sensational criminal trial in Southern history concluded its testimony portion on August 21, 1913, a few days after Leo Frank made an admission on the witness stand (August 18, 1913) that some say amounted to a murder trial confession
On August 18, 1913, Leo Frank reveals the solution to the Mary Phagan murder mystery stating he might have “unconsciously” gone to the bathroom in the metal room to counter Monteen Stover’s testimony that he was not in his inner or outer office from 12:05 to 12:10 PM on April 26, 1913:
Now gentlemen [of the Jury], to the best of my recollection from the time the whistle blew for twelve o’clock [noon on Saturday, April 26, 1913] until after a quarter to one [12:46 p.m.] when I went upstairs and spoke to Arthur White and Harry Denham [at the rear of the fourth floor], to the best of my recollection, I did not stir out of the inner office [at the front of the second floor]; but it is possible that in order to answer a call of nature or to urinate I may have gone to the toilet [in the metal room at the rear of the second floor]. Those are things that a man does unconsciously and cannot tell how many times nor when he does it (Leo Frank Trial Statement, August 18, Brief of Evidence, 1913; Georgia Supreme Court Brief, 1913, 1914).
Leo Frank astonishingly re-confirms he might have been in the men’s toilet (only one set of toilets existed on the second floor of the National Pencil Company factory, they are located in the machine department AKA metal room) at the time Monteen Stover said his office had been empty on the murder day (between 12:05 pm to 12:10 pm). This ineluctably incriminating admission was first given by Leo Frank on August 18, 1913, at his trial while he was seated on the witness stand. He once again placed himself at the scene of the crime at the time the sex-murder occurred. You have to read it with your own eyes to believe it.
U.S. Senator From Georgia Tom Watson:
Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Newspaper about the Leo Frank Case and its principals can be found in some of the weekly issues during 1914, 1915, 1916 and 1917 and in Watson’s monthly magazine (1915). Tom Watson’s best works on the Leo M. Frank case were published in August and September of 1915 in his Watson’s Jeffersonian Magazine.
Watson’s five major magazine works written serially on the Frank-Phagan affair, provide logical arguments confirming the guilt of Leo M. Frank with the superb reasoning of a seasoned criminal attorney. These five 1915 articles spread out over numerous months are absolutely required reading for anyone interested in the Leo M. Frank Case. Originals of these magazines are extremely difficult to find because efforts have been ongoing since 1915 to make them disappear. Fortunately, a small number of these issues have survived into the 21st century and they have been digitized so they might last forever.
January 1915: The Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (January 1915) Watson’s Magazine Volume 20 №3. See page 139 for the Leo Frank Case. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.
Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
March 1915: The Full Review of the Leo Frank Case By Tom Watson (March 1915) Volume 20. №5. See page 235 for ‘A Full Review of the Leo Frank Case’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.
Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
August 1915: The Celebrated Case of The State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank By Tom Watson (August 1915) Volume 21, No 4. See page 182 for ‘The Celebrated Case of the State of Georgia vs. Leo Frank”. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.
Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
September 1915: The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert By Tom Watson (September 1915) Volume 21. №5. See page 251 for ‘The Official Record in the Case of Leo Frank, Jew Pervert’. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.
Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
October 1915: The Rich Jews Indict a State! The Whole South Traduced in the Matter of Leo Frank By Tom Watson (October 1915) Volume 21. №6. See page 301. Jeffersonian Publishing Company, Thomson, Ga.
Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian Weekly Newspaper
Watson’s analysis of the Phagan-Frank case is the controversial forbidden fruit of truth that have been censored and suppressed for more than 100 years by Leo Frank’s defenders, except when they mention it for the purpose of mocking and deriding his works.
For a nearly complete selection of Watson’s weekly newspaper discussing the case (click here): Tom Watson’s Jeffersonian newspaper articles specifically related to the Murder of Mary Phagan and Leo Frank Case. This collection weekly newspapers about the Leo Frank case and it’s principals does not include the monthly Watson’s Magazine.
Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
Tom Watson Brown, Grandson of Thomas Edward Watson:
Notes on the Case of Leo M. Frank and its Aftermath by Tom W. Brown, Emery University, Atlanta, Georgia, 1982. Despite being marred by a few errors (including Brown’s belief in the Mary Phagan bitemark hoax) this is still overall a good analysis of the Leo Frank Case.
Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
The Elusive Leo Frank Georgia Supreme Court Archive (Required Reading):
Leo Frank Trial and Appeals Georgia Supreme Court File (1,800 pages). Digital Source: The Leo Frank Research Library
2017 Leo Frank Case Audiobook Serial: The American Mercury series on the Mary Phagan murder trial, read by Vanessa Neubauer (2017)
WWW Link: https://theamericanmercury.org/2013/04/100-reasons-proving-leo-frank-is-guilty/
The 29-Segment Audiobook. Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, Vol. 3, The Leo Frank Case, The Lynching of a Guilty Man by the N.O.I. Research Group (April 26, 2016). Required Listening.
Podcast 02
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/05/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-2
Podcast 03
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/05/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-3
Podcast 04
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/05/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-4
Segment 05
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/05/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-5
Podcast 06
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/05/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-6
Podcast 07
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/06/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-7
Podcast 08
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/06/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-8
Podcast 09
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/06/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-9
Podcast 10
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/06/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-10
Podcast 11
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/07/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-11
Podcast 12
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/07/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-12
Podcast 13
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/07/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-13
Podcast 14
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/07/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-14
Podcast 15
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/08/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-15
Podcast 16
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/08/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-16
Podcast 17
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/08/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-17
Podcast 18
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/08/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-18
Podcast 19
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/08/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-19
Podcast 20
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/09/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-20
Podcast 21
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/09/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-21
Podcast 22
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/09/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-22
Podcast 23
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/09/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-23
Podcast 24
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/10/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-24
Podcast 25
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/10/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-25
Podcast 26
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/10/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-26
Podcast 27
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/10/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-27
Podcast 28
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/11/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-28
Podcast 29
https://theamericanmercury.org/2018/11/the-leo-frank-case-the-lynching-of-a-guilty-man-part-29
Added 2019:
You Need to Watch this before history is erased on the Leo Frank Case https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N0sNB8uWAUs
Phagan Family’s Little Mary Phagan Website http://www.littlemaryphagan.com
Added 2020:
Tertiary Research on the Leo Frank case:
- National Pencil Company vs Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency https://archive.org/details/national-pencil-company-vs-pinkertons-national-detective-agency
- National Pencil Company vs Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency: Bill of Exceptions Certification https://archive.org/details/national-pencil-company-vs-pinkertons-national-detective-agency-bill-of-exceptions-certification
- National Pencil Company vs Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency: Bill of Exceptions Certification (Supreme Court) https://archive.org/details/npc-vs-pnda-bill-of-exceptions-certification-supreme-court
- National Pencil Company vs Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency: First Division https://archive.org/details/national-pencil-company-vs-pinkertons-national-detective-agency-first-division
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs National Pencil Company https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs National Pencil Company: Amended Motion for New Trial https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-amended-motion-for-new-trial
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs National Pencil Company: Answer of Defendant https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-answer-of-defendant
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs. National Pencil Company — Approval of Brief of Evidence https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-approval-of-brief-of-evidence/mode/1up
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs National Pencil Company: Bill of Exceptions https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-bill-of-exceptions
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs National Pencil Company: Brief of Evidence https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-brief-of-evidence/mode/2up
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs National Pencil Company: Charge of Court https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-charge-of-court/mode/2up
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs National Pencil Company: Corporation/Partnership https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-corporation-partnership/mode/1up
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs. National Pencil Company: Judgment https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-judgment/mode/1up
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs. National Pencil Company: Motion for New Trial https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-motion-for-new-trial/mode/1up
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs. National Pencil Company: Motion for New Trial Acknowledged by Plaintiff https://archive.org/details/pnda-vs-npc-motion-for-new-trial-acknowledged-by-plaintiff/mode/1up
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs. National Pencil Company: Motion for New Trial Read and Considered https://archive.org/details/pnda-vs-npc-motion-for-new-trial-read-and-considered
- Pinkerton’s National Detective Agency vs. National Pencil Company: Verdict https://archive.org/details/pinkertons-national-detective-agency-vs-national-pencil-company-verdict/mode/1up
- Report of Assistant Superintendent Harry Scott: April 28, 1913, https://archive.org/details/report-of-assistant-superintendent-harry-scott-1913-04-28/mode/2up
- Report of Assistant Superintendent Harry Scott: May 18, 1913, https://archive.org/details/report-of-assistant-superintendent-harry-scott-1913-05-18/mode/2up
- Report of Assistant Superintendent Harry Scott: May 23, 1913, https://archive.org/details/report-of-assistant-superintendent-harry-scott-1913-05-23/mode/1up
- Report of Assistant Superintendent Harry Scott: May 24, 1913, https://archive.org/details/report-of-assistant-superintendent-harry-scott-1913-05-24/mode/2up
- Report of Assistant Superintendent Harry Scott: May 25 & 27, 1913 https://archive.org/details/report-of-assistant-superintendent-harry-scott-1913-05-25-and-1913-05-27/mode/1up
- Report of Assistant Superintendent Harry Scott: May 28, 1913, https://archive.org/details/report-of-assistant-superintendent-harry-scott-1913-05-28/mode/1up
- Report of L. P. Whitfield https://archive.org/details/report-of-l-p-whitfield/mode/2up
- Statement of James Conley: May 18, 1913, https://archive.org/details/statement-of-james-conley-1913-05-18/mode/2up
- Statement of James Conley: May 24, 1913, https://archive.org/details/statement-of-james-conley-1913-05-24/mode/1up
- Statement of Jim Conley: May 28, 1913, https://archive.org/details/statement-of-jim-conley-1913-05-28/mode/2up
- Statement of Jim Conley: May 29, 1913, https://archive.org/details/statement-of-jim-conley-1913-05-29/mode/2up
- Testimony of Helen Kerns https://archive.org/details/testimony-of-helen-kerns/mode/2up
Even Jews who identify as Libertarians are beginning to realize the ADL is evil
The ADL is NOT the ALLY of the LEFT.
It’s time to #DROPTHEADL the movement is born in 2020.
end.
